The CIVILIAN INTELLIGENCE CENTRAL on Facebook
The most spectacular UFO sighting in U.S. history:
Forget about Roswell, 1947.
Forget about Phoenix, 1997.
Sure, those were undoubtedly very important events in the annals of UFO sightings history.
But when it comes to the most amazing sightings ever recorded in the U.S., nothing can even come close to what transpired over the skies of Farmington, New Mexico in 1950.
The most spectacular mass appearance of UFOs in U.S. history took place over the skies of Farmington, New Mexico in March of 1950.
It happened for three consecutive days.
The so-called 1997 Phoenix sightings pale in comparison to what happened in the town, not too far from the Four Corners area.
Anywhere from around 200 to 400 disc-shaped, metallic, silver-colored objects were seen in the sky, performing all kinds of maneuvers, making all kinds of formations and simply giving incredible flight show in the sky.
It all began at around 11 a.m. on March 15, 1950 and lasted for about an hour.
For three consecutive days, hundreds of astonished citizens of this town witnessed the most spectacular daytime mass UFO sightings ever recorded.
And it all took place during broad daylight, usually from around 11 a.m., lasting for about an hour.
The front page headline of Farmington Daily Times of March 18, documented the amazing sightings: HUGE SAUCER ARMADA JOLTS FARMINGTON.
For some reason or other, this incident seemed to have been hushed up quickly.
A few years ago I was fortunate enough to visit Farmington and was able to interview an elderly gentleman who was one of hundreds of witnesses to this spectacular event. He confirmed to me practically all the aspects of that incident as was reported in Farming Daily Times news article.
I visited the Farmington Senior Center to find some witnesses. Their number is rapidly diminishing.
According to some townsfolk, government agents came to town quickly after the incident, discouraging people to talk about the incident for national security reasons (the Cold War had gripped the psyche of the American people by 1950 and the people were quite receptive and cooperative with whatever the government had told them) and may even have bought up all the editions of the newspapers of March 18, 1950:
http://www.ufoevidence.org/cases/case880.htm
In the following article, one can still read the microfisched headline of Farmington Daily Times of March 18, 1950:
http://www.aliensthetruth.com/UFO_sightings_famous.php?view=1&ID=1
And, finally, here is another reference to the Farmington, New Mexico incident of 1950, along with an excellent discussion by Stanton Friedman on why New Mexico is so important in the post WWII history of UFO sightings:
UFOs, New Mexico and the Farmington Armada
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gSaq3Ori6js&NR=1
-from Norio Hayakawa
http://noriohayakawa2012.blogspot.com
http://www.facebook.com/norio.hayakawa
Saturday, May 15, 2010
Thursday, May 13, 2010
UFOs, Area 51 and Dulce.....the bottom line
May 13, 2010
by Norio Hayakawa
Here is my take on the whole subject of UFOs, Area 51 and Dulce:
UFOs, Area 51 and Dulce......the bottom line
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ImW5DmkIZ10
and, specifically, on UFOs:
My beliefs on the UFO phenomenon
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9b6iC39s3QE
-from Norio
http://noriohayakawa2012.blogspot.com
http://www.facebook.com/norio.hayakawa
by Norio Hayakawa
Here is my take on the whole subject of UFOs, Area 51 and Dulce:
UFOs, Area 51 and Dulce......the bottom line
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ImW5DmkIZ10
and, specifically, on UFOs:
My beliefs on the UFO phenomenon
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9b6iC39s3QE
-from Norio
http://noriohayakawa2012.blogspot.com
http://www.facebook.com/norio.hayakawa
Monday, May 3, 2010
UFO photographed near F-14 crash site in 1987?
A fascinating UFO photo, revealed recently by a former San Diego resident
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=un5oCxbLCVM
by Norio Hayakawa
May 5, 2010
At around 10:30 a.m. on March 21, 1987, there was a crash of an F-14 Tomcat fighter in a canyon just north of Scripps Ranch, San Diego, California.
The newswires reported that the crash occurred shortly after the jet had taken off from Miramar Naval Air Station.
Two pilots, after they ejected from the aircraft, said they heard 3 loud explosions as the jet plummeted to the ground.
The crash site was about one mile north of Scripps Miramar Ranch, about two miles northeast of Mira Mesa, and about 4 miles northeast of the air base.
About 65 firefighters from the San Diego Fire Department and Poway were summoned to the canyon area to battle a two-acre blaze triggered when the jet crashed.
Firefighters had trouble reaching the site because of the poor access roads through the rugged terrain.
The blaze continued for about three hours.
A Sheriff Department's helicopter, which had helped in transferring the pilots out of the area to the Naval air base, also aided firefighters by dumping water on hot spots.
Navy spokesman Lt. Ed Mapers said that "Quite a few people called us and they all said it was strange". "They said it was quiet and the aircraft was making no noise. It could lead you to believe possibly that the engines shut down".
Mr. Lucky Endo, a long-time area resident, said that he did not witness the crash itself nor did he see the crash site because it was on the other side of the hill.
But he heard the explosions and soon he witnessed two parachutes coming down.
He said that fire broke out but the fire engines may have had difficulty reaching the area.
A helicopter was used initially to put out the fire on the ground, he said.
Smoke from the crash was still visible for several hours.
According to him, the area was completely secured and became off limits to the public by the military, the police and the fire department.
What was most interesting was that Mr. Endo states that around 3:30 p.m., he began to observe an oval-shaped object hovering in the distance on the visible side of the hill, just above the tree lines.
It hovered in that area for about a minute or so.
Mr. Endo said he took two still photos at that time.
He did not take any videos.
He only sent me two copies of his original photos.
Therefore the images are not too clear but they are, nevertheless, most interesting.
His two still photos are presented in my short YouTube presentations.
According to the news reports, the F-14 Tomcat fighter had crashed due to electric malfunctioning.
Mr. Endo theorizes that the pilots of the jet may have earlier encountered an unidentified craft during the training mission and may even have been chasing the object.
He believes that the object that appeared around 3:30 p.m. may have been observing the crash site after the ground fire was put out.
The Navy never released any final investigation results on this incident.
Here is the first still photo of the object which is enlarged in the latter portion of my short YouTube presentation:
UFO photographed near F-14 crash site in 1987?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=un5oCxbLCVM
The second still photo is also presented in my following short YouTube presentation:
Second photo: UFO photographed near F-14 crash site in 1987?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=29uj89Y1gH0
-from Norio Hayakawa
http://noriohayakawa2012.blogspot.com
http://www.facebook.com/norio.hayakawa
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=un5oCxbLCVM
by Norio Hayakawa
May 5, 2010
At around 10:30 a.m. on March 21, 1987, there was a crash of an F-14 Tomcat fighter in a canyon just north of Scripps Ranch, San Diego, California.
The newswires reported that the crash occurred shortly after the jet had taken off from Miramar Naval Air Station.
Two pilots, after they ejected from the aircraft, said they heard 3 loud explosions as the jet plummeted to the ground.
The crash site was about one mile north of Scripps Miramar Ranch, about two miles northeast of Mira Mesa, and about 4 miles northeast of the air base.
About 65 firefighters from the San Diego Fire Department and Poway were summoned to the canyon area to battle a two-acre blaze triggered when the jet crashed.
Firefighters had trouble reaching the site because of the poor access roads through the rugged terrain.
The blaze continued for about three hours.
A Sheriff Department's helicopter, which had helped in transferring the pilots out of the area to the Naval air base, also aided firefighters by dumping water on hot spots.
Navy spokesman Lt. Ed Mapers said that "Quite a few people called us and they all said it was strange". "They said it was quiet and the aircraft was making no noise. It could lead you to believe possibly that the engines shut down".
Mr. Lucky Endo, a long-time area resident, said that he did not witness the crash itself nor did he see the crash site because it was on the other side of the hill.
But he heard the explosions and soon he witnessed two parachutes coming down.
He said that fire broke out but the fire engines may have had difficulty reaching the area.
A helicopter was used initially to put out the fire on the ground, he said.
Smoke from the crash was still visible for several hours.
According to him, the area was completely secured and became off limits to the public by the military, the police and the fire department.
What was most interesting was that Mr. Endo states that around 3:30 p.m., he began to observe an oval-shaped object hovering in the distance on the visible side of the hill, just above the tree lines.
It hovered in that area for about a minute or so.
Mr. Endo said he took two still photos at that time.
He did not take any videos.
He only sent me two copies of his original photos.
Therefore the images are not too clear but they are, nevertheless, most interesting.
His two still photos are presented in my short YouTube presentations.
According to the news reports, the F-14 Tomcat fighter had crashed due to electric malfunctioning.
Mr. Endo theorizes that the pilots of the jet may have earlier encountered an unidentified craft during the training mission and may even have been chasing the object.
He believes that the object that appeared around 3:30 p.m. may have been observing the crash site after the ground fire was put out.
The Navy never released any final investigation results on this incident.
Here is the first still photo of the object which is enlarged in the latter portion of my short YouTube presentation:
UFO photographed near F-14 crash site in 1987?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=un5oCxbLCVM
The second still photo is also presented in my following short YouTube presentation:
Second photo: UFO photographed near F-14 crash site in 1987?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=29uj89Y1gH0
-from Norio Hayakawa
http://noriohayakawa2012.blogspot.com
http://www.facebook.com/norio.hayakawa
Tuesday, April 27, 2010
U.S. National ID card.....will it become a reality?
U.S. National ID card...will it become a reality?
by Norio Hayakawa
April 27, 2010
As everyone knows, the United States has been facing a serious illegal immigration problem, especially in states such as Arizona, which has a long, virtually unprotected border with Mexico.
If nothing is done now, I am afraid that the United States will begin to lose its identity in the near future, on top of everything else relevant to this problem and its adverse consequences.
I fully support the new Arizona law on illegal immigration because it protects the rights of U.S. citizens as well as the rights of those who are in the U.S. legally.
This law is not about racial profiling.
In fact, it specifically condemns racial profiling.
It makes it illegal for any law enforcement official to even question the legal status of a person unless that person is clearly committing a crime or has committed a crime.
I think this is quite fair.
I believe that enforcing the border is essential. Many nations of the world have stringent border policies and enforcement.
Tall walls such as the ones separating Israeli settlements and the Palestinian areas in Israel may not be realistic and may not be the answer, at least for now, but something must be done to defend our borders besides just increasing the number of border patrols.
What about those estimated 12 million illegals who are here already?
Indeed this is a big problem. It may be logistically impossible to deport them en masse.
What should be done to these people?
Here is my suggestion:
Those who can prove that they have been here for 20 years or more and can prove it with documentation, should be made eligible for citizenship (only upon earnest request) or for Permanent Residency status provided that they pass a thorough background check, pay back taxes, pay a stiff penalty (for example, let's make it $1,776 each) and get a certificate of completion from an E.S.L. (English as a foreign language) school.
Those who can prove that they have been here for 5 years or more (but less than 20 years) with documentation, should not initially be made eligible for U.S. citizenship but should initially be made eligible only for a Permanent Residency status, provided that they also pass a thorough background check, pay back taxes, pay a stiff penalty (for example, let's make it $1,776 each) and get a certification from an E.S.L. school.
For those who have been here less than 5 years, the only recourse will be to voluntarily return to their point of origin.
Will they leave?
They will eventually leave if they cannot find jobs here.
In order to do this, the U.S. must thoroughly enforce the law that penalizes the hiring of illegals, i.e., those who do not possess the U.S. citizenship or Permanent Residency status or Work Visas.
Getting back to the topic of "racial profiling", the biggest problem is the simple fact that nobody can prove that a person is a U.S. citizen or is in the U.S. legally simply by looking at the color of his or her skin.
A driver's license does not indicate U.S. citizenship or that the person is in the U.S. legally.
Unfortunately, most U.S. citizens do not carry with them any document to prove that they are U.S. citizens, i.e., birth certificate, U.S. passport or certificate of naturalization.
This is why I believe that ultimately the U.S. will probably have no other alternative but to consider giving each U.S. citizen a U.S. National Identity card. Many nations of the world already require their citizens to carry national ID cards with them at all times.
This may sound very Orwellian, and personally I detest such measures (especially since, for many years, I have been fiercely fighting against and will continue to fiercely fight against any form of a forced New World Order or any form of a forced Global Government) but I believe that a U.S. ID card will be inevitable.
A growing number of U.S. citizens may begin to feel that a Federally issued U.S. National ID card, just like a U.S. passport, may be inevitable in the near future, and may begin to feel that another ID card, besides driver's license, may not become such a burden to carry at all times.
So, if such U.S. ID card becomes a reality, then what information should be on it?
Probably, for those who were born in the U.S.:
Photo, Date of Birth, City and State of Birth, Social Security Number and Current Address.
And probably, for those who were naturalized:
Photo, Date of Birth, City and Country of Birth, Social Security Number, Current Address, Date of Naturalization, City and State where naturalized, and Naturalization Number as indicated on Certificate of Naturalization.
In the far future, even some type of Biometric ID system may come into the picture, like it or not.
We must face this fact now, i.e., that we are already living in a world without much privacy.
This kind of measures may not prevent all crimes or stop terrorism, but it may become a first step to curtail them.
Norio Hayakawa
http://noriohayakawa2012.blogspot.com
http://www.facebook.com/norio.hayakawa
by Norio Hayakawa
April 27, 2010
As everyone knows, the United States has been facing a serious illegal immigration problem, especially in states such as Arizona, which has a long, virtually unprotected border with Mexico.
If nothing is done now, I am afraid that the United States will begin to lose its identity in the near future, on top of everything else relevant to this problem and its adverse consequences.
I fully support the new Arizona law on illegal immigration because it protects the rights of U.S. citizens as well as the rights of those who are in the U.S. legally.
This law is not about racial profiling.
In fact, it specifically condemns racial profiling.
It makes it illegal for any law enforcement official to even question the legal status of a person unless that person is clearly committing a crime or has committed a crime.
I think this is quite fair.
I believe that enforcing the border is essential. Many nations of the world have stringent border policies and enforcement.
Tall walls such as the ones separating Israeli settlements and the Palestinian areas in Israel may not be realistic and may not be the answer, at least for now, but something must be done to defend our borders besides just increasing the number of border patrols.
What about those estimated 12 million illegals who are here already?
Indeed this is a big problem. It may be logistically impossible to deport them en masse.
What should be done to these people?
Here is my suggestion:
Those who can prove that they have been here for 20 years or more and can prove it with documentation, should be made eligible for citizenship (only upon earnest request) or for Permanent Residency status provided that they pass a thorough background check, pay back taxes, pay a stiff penalty (for example, let's make it $1,776 each) and get a certificate of completion from an E.S.L. (English as a foreign language) school.
Those who can prove that they have been here for 5 years or more (but less than 20 years) with documentation, should not initially be made eligible for U.S. citizenship but should initially be made eligible only for a Permanent Residency status, provided that they also pass a thorough background check, pay back taxes, pay a stiff penalty (for example, let's make it $1,776 each) and get a certification from an E.S.L. school.
For those who have been here less than 5 years, the only recourse will be to voluntarily return to their point of origin.
Will they leave?
They will eventually leave if they cannot find jobs here.
In order to do this, the U.S. must thoroughly enforce the law that penalizes the hiring of illegals, i.e., those who do not possess the U.S. citizenship or Permanent Residency status or Work Visas.
Getting back to the topic of "racial profiling", the biggest problem is the simple fact that nobody can prove that a person is a U.S. citizen or is in the U.S. legally simply by looking at the color of his or her skin.
A driver's license does not indicate U.S. citizenship or that the person is in the U.S. legally.
Unfortunately, most U.S. citizens do not carry with them any document to prove that they are U.S. citizens, i.e., birth certificate, U.S. passport or certificate of naturalization.
This is why I believe that ultimately the U.S. will probably have no other alternative but to consider giving each U.S. citizen a U.S. National Identity card. Many nations of the world already require their citizens to carry national ID cards with them at all times.
This may sound very Orwellian, and personally I detest such measures (especially since, for many years, I have been fiercely fighting against and will continue to fiercely fight against any form of a forced New World Order or any form of a forced Global Government) but I believe that a U.S. ID card will be inevitable.
A growing number of U.S. citizens may begin to feel that a Federally issued U.S. National ID card, just like a U.S. passport, may be inevitable in the near future, and may begin to feel that another ID card, besides driver's license, may not become such a burden to carry at all times.
So, if such U.S. ID card becomes a reality, then what information should be on it?
Probably, for those who were born in the U.S.:
Photo, Date of Birth, City and State of Birth, Social Security Number and Current Address.
And probably, for those who were naturalized:
Photo, Date of Birth, City and Country of Birth, Social Security Number, Current Address, Date of Naturalization, City and State where naturalized, and Naturalization Number as indicated on Certificate of Naturalization.
In the far future, even some type of Biometric ID system may come into the picture, like it or not.
We must face this fact now, i.e., that we are already living in a world without much privacy.
This kind of measures may not prevent all crimes or stop terrorism, but it may become a first step to curtail them.
Norio Hayakawa
http://noriohayakawa2012.blogspot.com
http://www.facebook.com/norio.hayakawa
Monday, April 26, 2010
Stephen Hawking says that "aliens exist" but that "no aliens visit earth in UFOs"
Here are some interesting statements from Stephen Hawking:
"I discount suggestions that UFOs contain beings from outer space. I think any visits by aliens, would be much more obvious, and probably also, much more unpleasant".
Hawking continues:
"What is the explanation of why we have not been visited? One possibility is tha the argument, about the appearance of life on Earth, is wrong. Maybe the probability of life spontaneously appearing is so low, that Earth is the only planet in the galaxy, or in the observable universe, in which it happened. Another possibility is that there was a reasonable probability of forming self reproducing systems, like cells, but that most of these forms of life did not evolve intelligence".
However, Stephen Hawking says that "aliens do exist".
He even warns us "not to talk to aliens":
Don't talk to aliens, warns Stephen Hawking:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/science/space/article7107207.ece
Here is another article on Stephen Hawking's statements:
http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2010/04/stephen-hawking-udpate-alien-contact-not-a-wise-idea-a-sunday-feature.html
So, once again, I pose this question:
"What are UFOs?"
"Are we been deceived into believing that UFOs are physical spacecraft being piloted or maneuvered by physical, advanced, extraterrestrial beings? or are we talking about non-physical, ultra-dimensional entities who may be giving us impressions that they are materializing and de-materializing at will (or even be deceptively "posing" as representatives from advanced extraterrestrial civilizations), for purposes yet unknown to us?"
-from Norio Hayakawa
http://noriohayakawa2012.blogspot.com
http://www.facebook.com/norio.hayakawa
"I discount suggestions that UFOs contain beings from outer space. I think any visits by aliens, would be much more obvious, and probably also, much more unpleasant".
Hawking continues:
"What is the explanation of why we have not been visited? One possibility is tha the argument, about the appearance of life on Earth, is wrong. Maybe the probability of life spontaneously appearing is so low, that Earth is the only planet in the galaxy, or in the observable universe, in which it happened. Another possibility is that there was a reasonable probability of forming self reproducing systems, like cells, but that most of these forms of life did not evolve intelligence".
However, Stephen Hawking says that "aliens do exist".
He even warns us "not to talk to aliens":
Don't talk to aliens, warns Stephen Hawking:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/science/space/article7107207.ece
Here is another article on Stephen Hawking's statements:
http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2010/04/stephen-hawking-udpate-alien-contact-not-a-wise-idea-a-sunday-feature.html
So, once again, I pose this question:
"What are UFOs?"
"Are we been deceived into believing that UFOs are physical spacecraft being piloted or maneuvered by physical, advanced, extraterrestrial beings? or are we talking about non-physical, ultra-dimensional entities who may be giving us impressions that they are materializing and de-materializing at will (or even be deceptively "posing" as representatives from advanced extraterrestrial civilizations), for purposes yet unknown to us?"
-from Norio Hayakawa
http://noriohayakawa2012.blogspot.com
http://www.facebook.com/norio.hayakawa
Sunday, April 18, 2010
Death is only the beginning of life!!
Here is my "5-cents" worth of ramblings on life and death which I wrote a few years ago.
Now I put it on YouTube.
Here it is:
"Death is only the beginning of life!"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R1TLf2mrTeA
-from Norio
http://noriohayakawa2012.blogspot.com
http://www.facebook.com/norio.hayakawa
Now I put it on YouTube.
Here it is:
"Death is only the beginning of life!"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R1TLf2mrTeA
-from Norio
http://noriohayakawa2012.blogspot.com
http://www.facebook.com/norio.hayakawa
Monday, March 22, 2010
UFOs, The Bottom Line: My Honest Answers
Recently on the "Coast to Coast" radio talk show (March 16, 2010.......you can listen to the repeat of that program at the bottom of this page) I tried to answer some of the most frequently asked questions on the UFO phenomenon that have been specifically addressed to me.
Here, then, are my straightforward, honest answers to some of those questions:
1) Is there a physical, underground U.S./Alien Joint Bio-Lab in Dulce, New Mexico?
My answer:
To the best of my knowledge, there is no hard, tangible, solid, irrefutable, physical, documentary evidence whatsoever that supports the allegation that there is a physical, underground U.S./alien Joint Bio-Lab in Dulce, New Mexico.
But my personal opinion is that there is "something" there. What that "something" is, I do not know. There is something "real" there, but we still do not know for sure what "real" is. What is "reality" to some people may not be "reality" to another person.
Physical reality (as we know it) may not be the only "reality" that exists in this universe.
By the way, speaking of Dulce, most people have never heard that in 1967 the U.S. government had experimentally exploded an atomic bomb underground, just about 21 miles southwest of Dulce, New Mexico. It was part of a post-war program called "Plowshare". The U.S. government exploded a nuclear device about one and a half mile underground. That specific experiment was called Project Gasbuggy.
It was experimentally conducted to ease the flow of natural gas in that region. At least that was what the government had said.
Three years ago I had a unique chance to visit Ground Zero there, thanks to the kindness of a Jicarilla Apache resident of Dulce who took me there.
It is my opinion that initially there had been some minor radiation leaks in that area. Some ranchers even told me that the government may have been monitoring the radiation level found in some particular animals, such as certain cows in that region.
Also, I had heard about some recurrent problems in fertility among some women in the Dulce area.
These are questions that still need to be addressed and answered. It is still inconclusive.
Here is my crazy, wild hypothesis on Dulce:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VZAlvqCM4v8
2) Is Area 51 in Nevada still active?
My answer:
Yes, definitely. Even today, if one goes to the large parking area of E.G. & G. Terminal at Las Vegas' McCarren Airport, every weekday it is still filled with vehicles of employees who report to work at Groom Lake, Nevada (Area 51). There are still anywhere from 7 to 8 flights daily going to and from Area 51, on unmarked 737 jets that arrive and depart from the E.G. & G. Terminal.
In the past three years, there has been sizeable additions, clearly visible, to the Area 51 complex. Two years ago, a new 155-foot three-sided bluish radar tower was constructed by the tarmac. More new buildings, water tanks, etc., have been added in the past 3 years.
Last year, they just finished the construction of a humongous, new hangar towards the south of the complex. This new hangar is close to 4 times the size of the H-18 Hangar, until then the largest one on the complex.
Also, as of two months ago, they just completed the paving of the Groom Lake Road, from the complex all the way to the East perimeter boundary. A new communication tower has also been constructed near the East Guard Shack, near the boundary line.
Most people have no idea that Area 51 today has anywhere from about 1800 to 2200 part-time and full-time employees, all working on diverse, separate projects of highly compartmentalized programs conducted by defense contractors such as Lockheed, Northrop Grumman, Boeing, Raytheon, General Atomics, TRW, etc. etc.
Some employees are assigned on a daily basis. Some stay at the base for a few days, a week, weeks, etc., depending on their assignments.
Both the Area 51 complex in Nevada and the Dugway Proving Grounds in Utah are definitely and actively pursuing diversified defense-related projects.
But what does this all have to do with UFOs?
Absolutely nothing.
To a segment of the population, Area 51 has become associated with "extraterrestrial technologies" only because of the allegation (i.e., from Robert Lazar) that there had been a back-engineering program conducted in secrecy at an allegedly, relatively small complex, allegedly hidden along the slope of Papoose Mountains, by Papoose Lake, about 10 miles south of Area 51.
There is no visible evidence of the existence of this S-4 site, as far as any detection by satellite photo is concerned.
The alleged S-4 site has become associated with Area 51 only because of its proximity to Area 51.
The bottom line to S-4 is that it is still an allegation only. That does not mean that it does not exist. It is inconclusive.
3) What is your take on the alleged crash of an alien spacecraft near Roswell in 1947?
My answer:
Again, the bottom line is that there is no hard, tangible, solid, physical, irrefutable, documentary evidence for that.
It is difficult for me to conceive in my mind that any such highly advanced extraterrestrial civilization, traversing through this vast space and arriving at our earth would even "crash".
The concept of something "crashing" is a typical human concept. It is part of a typical human concept, bound by a limited, "linear", "empirical" thinking.
Any highly advanced civilization (that could even penetrate our dimensional barrier in a non-linear fashion) would never have such accidents, in my opinion.
If there were indeed such a "crash" near Roswell in 1947, the only way it could have been a "crash" would have been if it were intentionally "staged".
My belief is that the Roswell incident (the "crash") was staged by the "entities" themselves or through an elitist group within the shadow government, in collusion with those "entities", for a purpose yet unknown.
and, finally,
4) Do you believe that there are actual, physical extraterrestrial craft being piloted or maneuvered by actual, physical extraterrestrial entities from outer space?
My answer:
No.
The UFO phenomenon is definitely real, no question about it.
However, so far I see no actual, physical, solid, tangible, irrefutable evidence that there are actual, phyiscal extraterrestrial entities piloting or maneuvering actual, physical extraterrestrial craft.
But, then, what about the UFO phenomenon?
It is still a mystery.
Here is my take on the entire UFO phenomenon.
I owe everything to Dr. Jacques Vallee:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9b6iC39s3QE
In my opinion, the so-called abduction phenomenon is a real phenomenon, "real" to the "abducteees".
It is "real".
However, we still do not know for sure what "real" is.
My opinion is that there are many levels of "reality".
What is "real" to one person may not necessarily be "real" to another person.
This is the greatest challenge in ufology.
This may be a crazy thing to say, but maybe this life here itself may not really be "real".
This is why I say that ultimate "reality" can be experienced only after our physical death.
Anyway, here is:
My appearance on "Coast to Coast" talk radio show on March 16, 2010
http://www.coasttocoastam.com/show/2010/03/16
Norio Hayakawa
http://noriohayakawa2012.blogspot.com
http://www.facebook.com/norio.hayakawa
Here, then, are my straightforward, honest answers to some of those questions:
1) Is there a physical, underground U.S./Alien Joint Bio-Lab in Dulce, New Mexico?
My answer:
To the best of my knowledge, there is no hard, tangible, solid, irrefutable, physical, documentary evidence whatsoever that supports the allegation that there is a physical, underground U.S./alien Joint Bio-Lab in Dulce, New Mexico.
But my personal opinion is that there is "something" there. What that "something" is, I do not know. There is something "real" there, but we still do not know for sure what "real" is. What is "reality" to some people may not be "reality" to another person.
Physical reality (as we know it) may not be the only "reality" that exists in this universe.
By the way, speaking of Dulce, most people have never heard that in 1967 the U.S. government had experimentally exploded an atomic bomb underground, just about 21 miles southwest of Dulce, New Mexico. It was part of a post-war program called "Plowshare". The U.S. government exploded a nuclear device about one and a half mile underground. That specific experiment was called Project Gasbuggy.
It was experimentally conducted to ease the flow of natural gas in that region. At least that was what the government had said.
Three years ago I had a unique chance to visit Ground Zero there, thanks to the kindness of a Jicarilla Apache resident of Dulce who took me there.
It is my opinion that initially there had been some minor radiation leaks in that area. Some ranchers even told me that the government may have been monitoring the radiation level found in some particular animals, such as certain cows in that region.
Also, I had heard about some recurrent problems in fertility among some women in the Dulce area.
These are questions that still need to be addressed and answered. It is still inconclusive.
Here is my crazy, wild hypothesis on Dulce:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VZAlvqCM4v8
2) Is Area 51 in Nevada still active?
My answer:
Yes, definitely. Even today, if one goes to the large parking area of E.G. & G. Terminal at Las Vegas' McCarren Airport, every weekday it is still filled with vehicles of employees who report to work at Groom Lake, Nevada (Area 51). There are still anywhere from 7 to 8 flights daily going to and from Area 51, on unmarked 737 jets that arrive and depart from the E.G. & G. Terminal.
In the past three years, there has been sizeable additions, clearly visible, to the Area 51 complex. Two years ago, a new 155-foot three-sided bluish radar tower was constructed by the tarmac. More new buildings, water tanks, etc., have been added in the past 3 years.
Last year, they just finished the construction of a humongous, new hangar towards the south of the complex. This new hangar is close to 4 times the size of the H-18 Hangar, until then the largest one on the complex.
Also, as of two months ago, they just completed the paving of the Groom Lake Road, from the complex all the way to the East perimeter boundary. A new communication tower has also been constructed near the East Guard Shack, near the boundary line.
Most people have no idea that Area 51 today has anywhere from about 1800 to 2200 part-time and full-time employees, all working on diverse, separate projects of highly compartmentalized programs conducted by defense contractors such as Lockheed, Northrop Grumman, Boeing, Raytheon, General Atomics, TRW, etc. etc.
Some employees are assigned on a daily basis. Some stay at the base for a few days, a week, weeks, etc., depending on their assignments.
Both the Area 51 complex in Nevada and the Dugway Proving Grounds in Utah are definitely and actively pursuing diversified defense-related projects.
But what does this all have to do with UFOs?
Absolutely nothing.
To a segment of the population, Area 51 has become associated with "extraterrestrial technologies" only because of the allegation (i.e., from Robert Lazar) that there had been a back-engineering program conducted in secrecy at an allegedly, relatively small complex, allegedly hidden along the slope of Papoose Mountains, by Papoose Lake, about 10 miles south of Area 51.
There is no visible evidence of the existence of this S-4 site, as far as any detection by satellite photo is concerned.
The alleged S-4 site has become associated with Area 51 only because of its proximity to Area 51.
The bottom line to S-4 is that it is still an allegation only. That does not mean that it does not exist. It is inconclusive.
3) What is your take on the alleged crash of an alien spacecraft near Roswell in 1947?
My answer:
Again, the bottom line is that there is no hard, tangible, solid, physical, irrefutable, documentary evidence for that.
It is difficult for me to conceive in my mind that any such highly advanced extraterrestrial civilization, traversing through this vast space and arriving at our earth would even "crash".
The concept of something "crashing" is a typical human concept. It is part of a typical human concept, bound by a limited, "linear", "empirical" thinking.
Any highly advanced civilization (that could even penetrate our dimensional barrier in a non-linear fashion) would never have such accidents, in my opinion.
If there were indeed such a "crash" near Roswell in 1947, the only way it could have been a "crash" would have been if it were intentionally "staged".
My belief is that the Roswell incident (the "crash") was staged by the "entities" themselves or through an elitist group within the shadow government, in collusion with those "entities", for a purpose yet unknown.
and, finally,
4) Do you believe that there are actual, physical extraterrestrial craft being piloted or maneuvered by actual, physical extraterrestrial entities from outer space?
My answer:
No.
The UFO phenomenon is definitely real, no question about it.
However, so far I see no actual, physical, solid, tangible, irrefutable evidence that there are actual, phyiscal extraterrestrial entities piloting or maneuvering actual, physical extraterrestrial craft.
But, then, what about the UFO phenomenon?
It is still a mystery.
Here is my take on the entire UFO phenomenon.
I owe everything to Dr. Jacques Vallee:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9b6iC39s3QE
In my opinion, the so-called abduction phenomenon is a real phenomenon, "real" to the "abducteees".
It is "real".
However, we still do not know for sure what "real" is.
My opinion is that there are many levels of "reality".
What is "real" to one person may not necessarily be "real" to another person.
This is the greatest challenge in ufology.
This may be a crazy thing to say, but maybe this life here itself may not really be "real".
This is why I say that ultimate "reality" can be experienced only after our physical death.
Anyway, here is:
My appearance on "Coast to Coast" talk radio show on March 16, 2010
http://www.coasttocoastam.com/show/2010/03/16
Norio Hayakawa
http://noriohayakawa2012.blogspot.com
http://www.facebook.com/norio.hayakawa
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)